It's good to have Wi-Fi tethering on some smartphones these days as it has a number of advantages over Bluetooth when it comes to connecting notebooks and other devices over a mobile to the Internet:
- Wi-Fi is now built into virtually any consumer device with services requiring Internet access while Bluetooth is not yet universally available, especially in the notebook and netbook sector
- It's easy to set-up for the average user
- Several people can share the connection simultaneously
- The transmission speed of Wi-Fi is sufficient for 3G high speed data rates while Bluetooth is limited to 2-3 MBit/s.
Any disadvantage? Yes, tethering has to be manually activated/deactivated on the mobile as running the Wi-Fi chip on the mobile in access point mode quickly depletes the battery. This is unlike Bluetooth that I have switched on all the time and can thus be used for Internet connectivity without prior interaction with the device.
So what's the next step? One thing I like about Bluetooth is that I can quickly browse the file system of the mobile to transfer files such as pictures I have taken to the notebook, again without interacting with the mobile device prior to the transfer. The disadvantage is again the slow transmission speed for about 2-3 Mbit/s, making the transfer of more than two or three pictures, each being 1-2 megabytes a somewhat uncomfortable procedure.
This is where Wi-Fi tethering could help in the future. As the mobile is reachable via an IP address it could also host an SMB server so any Windows/Linux/Mac box could access the files on the device and transfers would be much quicker than over Bluetooth. Especially a plus if lots of content has to be transferred.
So let's see when this functionality will be built in as well…
Great suggestion but how about another protocol like WebDAV or FTP that Microsoft doesn’t own like it does SMB 😛