Mobile Data Roaming Charges On The EU Watchlist

Dean Bubley over at "Disruptive Wireless" reports from the Mobile Broadband Congress in London that a policy maker from the European Commission said in his keynote speech that wireless operators should not only think about voice roaming prices, which will soon be regulated, but they should also start thinking about consumer friendly data roaming prices if they want to keep the EU from repeating the regulation exercise:

"He pointedly remarked that the new regulations task national regulators
with "monitoring" both voice and data roaming, and that everything
would be reassessed in 18 months’ time."

18 months is a long time from a consumer point of view (i.e. ME) but let’s hope operators start that "thinking process" rather sooner than later.

For the moment, only few usable offers exist for international data roaming:

Vodafone Germany’s WebSessions for 15 Euros a day work quite well for business travelers but the offer is way too expensive for the average consumer or for only checking eMails and news every now and then on the mobile phone while in another country.

A great alternative and good example for other operators is "3", if you happen to live in a country with a Hutchison "3" network and travel to other countries with a "3" network. Basically they have scraped roaming charges for both voice and data altogether. Just too bad they are only present in a few countries.

When traveling to countries such as Germany, Italy, Austria, the U.K. and Spain, prepaid SIMs are also a good alternative. Here’s a list of countries and operators that offer mobile Internet access via prepaid SIMs.

An Introduction To SC-FDMA Used By LTE In Uplink Direction

Both WiMAX and the UMTS successor technology LTE use Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) as the core modulation technology on the air interface in downlink direction. In uplink direction, however, the two systems go different ways. While WiMAX uses OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access), the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) standardization group has decided to use SC-FDMA (Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access) instead.

In essence, SC-FDMA builds on OFDMA so the two systems are not as different as it seems at first. In addition, the abbreviation SC-FDMA is quite misleading as the technology, like OFDMA, also uses many sub-carriers on the air interface. To explain how SC-FDMA works it’s best to first take a look at OFDMA (used by WiMAX) and then discuss the differences to SC-FDMA.

OFDMA

Ofdma
OFDMA transmits a data stream by using several narrow band sub-carriers simultaneously, e.g. 512, 1024 or even more depending on the overall available bandwidth (e.g. 5, 10, 20 MHz) of the channel. As many bits are transported in parallel, the transmission speed on each sub carrier can be much lower than the overall resulting data rate. This is important in a practical radio environment in order to minimize effect of multipath fading created by slightly different arrival times of the signal from different directions.

As shown in the first figure on the left the input bits are first grouped and assigned for transmission over different frequencies (sub-carriers). In the example, 4 bits (representing a 16QAM modulation) are using for constructing each sub-carrier. In theory, each sub-carrier signal could be generated by a separate transmission chain hardware block. The output of these blocks would then have to be summed up and the resulting signal could then be sent over the air. Due to the high number of sub-carriers used this approach is not practicable. Instead, a mathematical approach is taken: As each sub-carrier is transmitted on a different frequency a graph which shows the frequency on the x-axis and the amplitude of each sub-carrier on the y-axis can be constructed. Then, a mathematical functional called Inverse Fast Fourier Transformation (IFFT) is applied which transforms the diagram from the frequency domain to time domain. This diagram has the time on the x-axis and represents the same signal as would have been generated by the separate transmission chains for each sub-carrier when summed up. The IFFT thus does exactly the same as the separate transmission chains for each sub carrier would do including summing up the individual results.

On the receiver side the signal is first demodulated and amplified. The result is then treated by a Fast Fourier Transformation function which converts the time signal back into the frequency domain. This reconstructs the frequency/amplitude diagram created at the transmitter. At the center frequency of each sub-carrier a detector function is then used to generate the bits which were originally used to create the sub-carrier.

SC-FDMA

Scfdma
Despite its name, Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) also transmits data over the air interface in many sub-carriers but adds an additional processing step as shown in the second figure. Instead of putting 4 bits together as in the OFDM example to form the signal for one sub-carrier, the additional processing block in SC-FDMA spreads the information of each bit over all the sub-carriers. This is done as follows: Again, a number of bits (e.g. 4 representing a 16 QAM modulation) are grouped together. In OFDM, these groups of bits would have been the input of the IDFT. In SC-FDMA, however, these bits are now piped into a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) function first. The output of the process is the basis for the creation of the sub-carriers for the following IFFT. As not all sub-carriers are used by the mobile station, many of them are set to zero in the diagram. These may or may not be used by other mobile stations.

On the receiver side the signal is demodulated, amplified and treated by the Fast Fourier Transformation function in the same way as in OFDMA. The resulting amplitude diagram, however, is now not analyzed straight away to get the original data stream but fed to the Inverse Fast Fourier Transformation function to remove the effect of the additional signal processing originally done at the transmitter side. The result of the IFFT is again a time domain signal. The time domain signal is now fed to a single detector block which recreates the original bits. Thus, instead of detecting the bits on many different sub-carriers, only a single detector is used on a single carrier.

Summary of the difference between OFDM and SC-FDMA:

OFDM takes groups of input bits (0’s and 1’s) to assemble the sub-carriers which are then processed by the IDFT to get a time signal. SC-FDMA in contrast first runs an FFT over the groups of input bits to spread them over all sub-carriers and then uses the result for the IDFT which creates the time signal. This is why SC-FDMA is sometimes also referred to as FFT spread OFDM.

While SC-FDMA adds additional complexity at both the transmitter and receiver side, the 3GPP standardization body has nevertheless decided for it as treating signal this way reduces the Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR). This is important to lower the power consumption of mobile devices. More details on PAPR can be found here.

Ericsson Paper on HSDPA Performance And Evolution

Frequent readers of my blog might have noticed my fascination for real live HSDPA performance as of late. Here’s a paper from Ericsson on HSDPA performance with category 12 and 6 terminals in stationary and moving environments in live networks. Based on my own measurements I fully agree with their results. At the end it also contains a quick overview of enhancements to come to increase overall bandwidth of the network and per user. A well written paper!

The PAPR Problem

I’ve happened to stumble over PAPR (Peak to Average Power Ratio) quite a lot lately as it seems to play a big role in WiMAX and 3GPP LTE mobile devices. Most papers mention that LTE has a better PAPR than WiMAX but fail to explain what it is and why this is so important. After some research and help from a number of experts here’s an intro to PAPR:

When transmitting data from the mobile terminal to the network, a power amplifier is required to boost the outgoing signal to a level high enough to be picked up by the network. The power amplifier is one of the biggest consumers of energy in a device and should thus be as power efficient as possible to increase the operation time of the device on a battery charge. The efficiency of a power amplifier depends on two factors:

  • The amplifier must be able to amplify the highest peak value of the wave. Due to silicon constraints, the peak value decides over the power consumption of the amplifier.
  • The peaks of the wave however do not transport any more information than the average power of the signal over time. The transmission speed therefore doesn’t depend on the peak power output required for the peak values of the wave but rather on the average power level.

As both power consumption and transmission speed are of importance for designers of mobile devices the power amplifier should consume as little energy as possible. Thus, the lower the difference between the peak power to the average power (PAPR) the longer is the operating time of a mobile device at a certain transmission speed compared to devices that use a modulation schemes with a higher PAPR.

Now let’s come back to the beginning of this blog entry in which I said that papers generally say that LTE has a better PAPR than WiMAX. This is because of different modulation schemes used in the uplink. While WiMAX uses OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access) which is fast but has a high PAPR, LTE designers choose to use SC-FDMA (Single Carrier – Frequency Division Multiple Access) which is as fast but is said to have a better PAPR. So what’s OFDMA and SC-FDMA? Well, that’s for another blog entry.

Going to Boston

Looks like I’ll be in Boston at the beginning of June for a couple of days. As I haven’t been at the east coast before please let me know if you have any suggestions for things to see in and around Boston, wireless, technology and historical. My schedule is packed with interesting and exciting stuff but I am sure I’ll find the time for a bit of sightseeing as well. If you live near by and would like to meet, please let me know as well. My eMail address is "gsmumts AT gmx.de".

The Carnival Of The Mobilists #74

Wow, a year has passed since I last had the honor to host the Carnival of the Mobilists on my site. Last time I got the heads up for hosting the Carnival via eMail while sitting in a taxi on the way from Lisbon airport to the city center. This time around, Rome’s the place, and my notebook is wirelessly connected via HSDPA.

It has been a great time since then in many ways and people contributing to the Carnival have sparked many great thoughts and ideas in me. The Carnival has also been invaluable to me in finding new people entering the mobile space and helped me a lot to keep my blog roll fine tuned to my interests and the ever growing, sometimes shrinking, but greatly evolving blog sites on mobile out there on the web. So thanks to all of you contributing to the Carnival and I hope you enjoy this week’s selection again:

  • Nokia’s Transition To An Internet / Computer Company: Not to miss, and thus my favorite post of the week, is Michael Mace‘s analysis at Mobile Opportunity of Nokia’s transition process which top managers of the company keep mentioning to the press.
  • Open Motorola: A lot of articles in this and previous Carnivals on Nokia so I was delighted to see Jason Devitt of Skydeck submitting an article about open OS platforms being pushed by Motorola.
    He doesn’t only discuss platform strategy for the 2007 Motorola device
    collection but also what OEMs are doing to get a presence in the
    wireless market.
  • Innovate Europe 07: Rudy de Waele of m-trends.org must have had an exhilarating and busy week at Innovate Europe 07 as it seems he aimed for the Guinness Book of Records with the length of his blog post. His post contains tons of interesting information and is well structured so you’ll find the pieces of information that interest you very quickly.
  • MobileCampNYC: More meeting and conference reporting: Marshall Sponder of SmartMobs has posted his impressions of MobileCampNYC which took place this week. Too bad New York is so far away from here, looks like it was worth going.
  • Web 2.0 Micro Payment: Mobile Web 2.0 evangelist Ajit Jaokar writes about content discovery on YouTube and about finding a song/video so dear to him that he had to keep listening/viewing all afternoon. Dreaming aside he starts thinking about how producer, artist and distributer could be paid for their effort and his pleasure. Check it out at his Open Gardens blog.
  • Hardware/Software Bugs: The functionality of mobile phones
    keeps growing and growing which is both good and bad. The down side is
    of course that the more stuff is inside the more can break. Tarek El Ghazali from "Symbiano-Tek" reports some trouble with his N80 that keeps forgetting time and date.
  • Warranty Service For That Mobile Computer: Ricky Cadden of "Symbian-Guru.com" writes about his bad experiences with the NokiaUSA warranty service.
    I have to agree with him, 24 days return time for a broken N-series
    mobile is not acceptable. Nokia claims their n-series devices
    replace computer, camera, maps, etc. etc. That’s nice but it also
    creates a single point of failure that needs to be fixed ASAP an not in
    24 days…
  • The World Before And After The iPod: I very much like Tomi Ahonen‘s thoughts about mobile on his "Communities Dominate Brands" site. This week he features an exciting article in which he postulates that soon mobile history will be seen as a time before the iPhone and a time after the iPhone. An article not to be missed.
  • The Mobile But Non Web Device: In contrast to the article before, Barry Welford over at "Stay Go Links" argues that the mobile web is only a thing for geeks and companies should rather concentrate on developing a keyless phone just for making phone calls and not much else. He must feel a bit lonely with his opinion among the other articles in the Carnival this week. Nevertheless, his blog entry contains some interesting points!
  • JavaFX: Sun seems to have decided to enter the mobile phone OS market. Competition is good and David Beers over at "Software Everywhere" takes a critical look at JavaFX, a mix of Linux and Java.
  • U.S. Wireless Data Revenues: Chetan Sharma reports the latest numbers from wireless operators (sorry, wireless carriers) in the U.S. on "Always On Real-Time". 5 billion dollars revenue from mobile data services in the last quarter, 60% of it from non-SMS revenue. Here are the details.
  • Where To Store The Data: Mark Wickersham sent in a post for Barbara Ballard of "Little Springs Design" with an introduction of where to developers should store their data. "local, server, and mixed mode applications" is the title of the post.

Wow, what a selection again this week, I hope you enjoyed it! We are almost at the end of the post and I have changed location in the meantime from Rome to Paris. Next week, Andreas Constantinou of the VisionMobile Forum will host the carnival.

And last but not least, if you want to submit a story of your own, send an eMail by next Friday to "mobilists at gmail.com" or use the carnival form here.

The Nokia N73 Is A Rising Star

Wherever I go these days I see people with Nokia N-73 phones walking around. Incredible for a phone that has just been available for a couple of months. I think there are even more people now with an N-73 than with an N-70 which I think has been announced by Nokia as their so far most successful smartphone. Take a look at the Flickr statistics for picture uploads from Nokia phones. The curve for the N-73 shoots up like a rocket and has surpassed all Nokia’s by far already. A comparison of picture uploads between different brands would be interesting. Anyone aware of such a statistic?

Wind Italy seems to soft launch HSDPA

Quite a surprise today in Rome when my data card suddenly showed HSDPA instead of 3G when I logged on to the Internet with a SIM card from WIND. I haven’t seen an announcement on their web page yet nor anywhere in the streets. So I checked Google news, but came up empty handed as well. Did anyone besides me notice as well?

The transmission speed, however, was far from what it could be (like for example in the TIM network, for measurement details see here) due to constant TCP retries which I’ve also experienced in 3G mode in the past. It doesn’t have a lot of impact on web browsing and Skype but downloads of larger files take 2-3 times longer than over a good connection. I tried with a second HSDPA terminal of a different manufacturer and got the same results. Let’s hope Wind fixes this issue before the official launch.

Cool N95 Marketing

The Nokia N95’s had me in it’s ban every since it was first announced. Finally, it’s also making it into the shops. I especially liked what I saw today when I walked by a shopping window of a mobile store in Rome. Take a close look at the trash bin on the left of the second picture 🙂

When I saw the first N95 in a store a couple of weeks ago the price was a hefty €739.-. Last week I saw one with a price tag of €699.-. And this week I saw it for €649.- (taxes included), no SIM lock. Very nice, I hope it keeps going in this direction. Amazon.de ships it (to Germany and Austria) for €663.95, postage and packing included.

N951N952

N953
N954

Italy, Mobile-TV and Football

DVB-H has been introduced in Italy already last year and it looks like it’s catching on. Now offered by Three and TIM, Italy not only seems to be the land where you can see people making video calls, it also seems to be the land of people that are watching TV on the go. It might have something to do with football as both people I observed, one on Saturday and one today, where watching a football game. While one of them was a hotel employee using his break outside to peek at a game, the other might have been an office worker waiting at the bus stop in Rome. People watching mobile TV are unmistakable because the mobile TV phones currently offered in Italy are mostly by Samsung, have a screen that can be rotated by 90 degrees and have a nice little extractable DVB-H antenna. Hm, maybe I should give it a try while I am here…