Two Additional UMTS Prepaid Internet Access Offers In Germany

I like it when competition works! A couple of months ago, three German Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNO’s) of E-Plus (KPN) lowered their prepaid mobile Internet access prices to 24 cents per megabyte. At the time, AldiTalk was the clear winner since it was the only one that did not only allow the use of E-Plus’ GPRS network but also of it’s UMTS network. Today Teltarif announced that Blau and Simyo customers can now also UMTS. Existing customers need to exchange their SIM cards.

Teltarif further reports that T-Mobile Germany MVNO "klarmobile" will also launch a prepaid wireless Internet access offer soon. I am curiously waiting for the details.

DMedia Announces GSM/WiMAX Mobile

WiMAX World in Vienna, Austria has just started so we are probably going to see a couple of interesting WiMAX announcements in the next couple of days. Nokia already announced some time ago that they are working on a WiMAX mobile phone for 2008. No details given so far. Now, DMedia (Taiwan) and Comsys (Israel) have announced that the former is in the process of developing a WiMAX/GSM/GPRS (GPS) handset/PDA for release in 2008.

No further details are given and the web pages of the companies at this point also don’t contain any more details so it’s about as much vaporware as the Nokia announcement at this time. However, this vaporware announcement is a bit different.

First, it seems that they have understood that a WiMAX only mobile will not be worth much. First network deployments, similarly as when 3G first started, will be patchy at best, so users will need an alternative when not in a WiMAX area. One could even go as far as to speculate that GSM will be used for voice traffic even in WiMAX covered areas. That would make mobile WiMAX deployment a lot easier as coverage would not have to be engineered to have margin high enough to allow smooth handovers for voice calls at cell edges. Also, WiMAX operators could slowly ramp up their mobile VoIP offerings instead of getting battered by lousy mobile performance in the beginning.

And second, the announcement also shows that with a bit of luck, WiMAX will give back benchers in the mobile terminal market such as DMedia (ever heard of them before?) a chance on the market.

Original Source: Heise

Interesting Data On Rural 3G Deployments

Here’s a link to another fascinating article published in an Ericsson’s "Review" periodical. This one deals with the technology and business case to cover rural areas with 3G WCDMA HSPA for mobile telephony as well as for fixed and mobile broadband Internet access. I was quite surprised to see Ericsson disclosing and discussing a number of very interesting numbers in a public paper.

One part of the document deals with the technical background information on the WCDMA 850 MHz network deployment by Telstra in Australia. The paper describes how different factors such as antenna types and configuration of base stations, indoor and outdoor directional antennas at customer sites influence both the coverage area of a base station and throughput per user at the cell edge. Ericsson says in the paper that the typical rural 3G cell in the Australian outback has a cell radius of 60 km.  Indirectly, they also mention in that for this scenario the land needs to be flat, the radio tower needs to be very high and directional outdoor antennas are required at the subscriber’s home. Note: Telstra’s got a coverage map online here, type in 6450 as postal code to get started)

Another part of the document deals with a business case for a 3G network generally and for rural deployment specifically. They base their calculation on a network with an average rural cell radius of 12 km and 15 inhabitants per square kilometer. Some noteworthy figures:

  • CAPEX for upgrade of an existing GSM site to 3G: € 240.000. I assume this is the price of the base station plus site preparation, installation, etc.
  • For their calculation they use a voice telephony ARPU (average revenue per user) of €15.- a month, €3.- a month per subscriber for mobile data and €1.- a month per subscriber for mobile TV. In addition 40% of the subscribers use the network for broadband Internet access as ADSL is not available.

With those numbers, Ericsson calculates that the cell generates €212.184 a year in voice, mobile handset data and mobile TV revenues. Broadband internet adds another €132.000 to that. A clear statement that data revenues are strong but the main revenue is still made with mobile handset voice and data applications. With a 6 year deprecation and annual OPEX costs of €40.000 of the cell, Ericsson estimates the cost of the cell to be around €80.000 a year which translates into a gross margin of the site to 75%.

And finally it’s also quite interesting to see that the paper clearly pushes 3G’s advantage over WiMAX, i.e. combined broadband Internet and voice telephony service with one infrastructure and lays out it’s arguments accordingly. A similar paper from the WiMAX industry laying out their arguments so one could compare would be nice. If you have seen one, please let me know.

Bluetooth To Use Wifi As A Physical Layer?

Bluetooth’s had a speed dilemma for quite some time now. After introducing new modulation and coding schemes with Bluetooth 2.0 already back in 2004 it seems to be impractical to push speeds beyond 2 MBit/s on the original Bluetooth physical layer. A speed upgrade, however, is direly needed as file sizes of photos and videos grow. Also, network speeds of HSDPA and EV-DO networks already surpass Bluetooth 2.0 speeds, thus rendering it unsuitable as a technology to connect notebooks to phones for high speed wireless Internet access.

In 2005/2006 the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) decided to use the Ultra Wide Band (UWB) standard of the WiMedia Alliance as a phyiscal layer. Up to today, however, standards have not been published and no devices are in sight. Instead, it is now rumored that the SIG has started talks with the 802.11 working group to also use Wifi as a physical layer for future Bluetooth versions.

The rumors are spread by two reliable German technology and telecommunication magazines, Heise News and Teltarif. Unfortunately they are only quoting "well informed circles" and do not give any references for their claims. The English speaking world seems not to have picked up on it so far, my Google search came up empty. If you’ve seen this rumor somewhere else, please leave a comment with the link.

Too little too late?

I wonder if faster Bluetooth is still needed as other wireless alternatives are already on the market today. Many phones such as Nokia’s N-Series phones (think N80, N93, N95…) have Wifi on board, as have many Windows Mobile PDA’s. These devices could use their wifi chips in access point mode as suggested here to offer notebooks (plural!) access to the Internet via their fast HSDPA or EV-DO chips. As far as I know none of these devices actually allow this today but the hardware is in place. No need for an extra Bluetooth stack on top.

For other uses such as large picture and video file transfers other alternatives that use Wifi are already available today as well. Nokia has put Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) into some of their N-Series phones to connect their devices to the digital home.

If Bluetooth wants to play a role in this market in the future the SIG has quite some catch-up to play or else Bluetooth will be doomed in the future as a technology for wireless headset connection and as slow data exchange protocol for small files.

Mobile Data Roaming Charges On The EU Watchlist

Dean Bubley over at "Disruptive Wireless" reports from the Mobile Broadband Congress in London that a policy maker from the European Commission said in his keynote speech that wireless operators should not only think about voice roaming prices, which will soon be regulated, but they should also start thinking about consumer friendly data roaming prices if they want to keep the EU from repeating the regulation exercise:

"He pointedly remarked that the new regulations task national regulators
with "monitoring" both voice and data roaming, and that everything
would be reassessed in 18 months’ time."

18 months is a long time from a consumer point of view (i.e. ME) but let’s hope operators start that "thinking process" rather sooner than later.

For the moment, only few usable offers exist for international data roaming:

Vodafone Germany’s WebSessions for 15 Euros a day work quite well for business travelers but the offer is way too expensive for the average consumer or for only checking eMails and news every now and then on the mobile phone while in another country.

A great alternative and good example for other operators is "3", if you happen to live in a country with a Hutchison "3" network and travel to other countries with a "3" network. Basically they have scraped roaming charges for both voice and data altogether. Just too bad they are only present in a few countries.

When traveling to countries such as Germany, Italy, Austria, the U.K. and Spain, prepaid SIMs are also a good alternative. Here’s a list of countries and operators that offer mobile Internet access via prepaid SIMs.

An Introduction To SC-FDMA Used By LTE In Uplink Direction

Both WiMAX and the UMTS successor technology LTE use Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) as the core modulation technology on the air interface in downlink direction. In uplink direction, however, the two systems go different ways. While WiMAX uses OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access), the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) standardization group has decided to use SC-FDMA (Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access) instead.

In essence, SC-FDMA builds on OFDMA so the two systems are not as different as it seems at first. In addition, the abbreviation SC-FDMA is quite misleading as the technology, like OFDMA, also uses many sub-carriers on the air interface. To explain how SC-FDMA works it’s best to first take a look at OFDMA (used by WiMAX) and then discuss the differences to SC-FDMA.

OFDMA

Ofdma
OFDMA transmits a data stream by using several narrow band sub-carriers simultaneously, e.g. 512, 1024 or even more depending on the overall available bandwidth (e.g. 5, 10, 20 MHz) of the channel. As many bits are transported in parallel, the transmission speed on each sub carrier can be much lower than the overall resulting data rate. This is important in a practical radio environment in order to minimize effect of multipath fading created by slightly different arrival times of the signal from different directions.

As shown in the first figure on the left the input bits are first grouped and assigned for transmission over different frequencies (sub-carriers). In the example, 4 bits (representing a 16QAM modulation) are using for constructing each sub-carrier. In theory, each sub-carrier signal could be generated by a separate transmission chain hardware block. The output of these blocks would then have to be summed up and the resulting signal could then be sent over the air. Due to the high number of sub-carriers used this approach is not practicable. Instead, a mathematical approach is taken: As each sub-carrier is transmitted on a different frequency a graph which shows the frequency on the x-axis and the amplitude of each sub-carrier on the y-axis can be constructed. Then, a mathematical functional called Inverse Fast Fourier Transformation (IFFT) is applied which transforms the diagram from the frequency domain to time domain. This diagram has the time on the x-axis and represents the same signal as would have been generated by the separate transmission chains for each sub-carrier when summed up. The IFFT thus does exactly the same as the separate transmission chains for each sub carrier would do including summing up the individual results.

On the receiver side the signal is first demodulated and amplified. The result is then treated by a Fast Fourier Transformation function which converts the time signal back into the frequency domain. This reconstructs the frequency/amplitude diagram created at the transmitter. At the center frequency of each sub-carrier a detector function is then used to generate the bits which were originally used to create the sub-carrier.

SC-FDMA

Scfdma
Despite its name, Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) also transmits data over the air interface in many sub-carriers but adds an additional processing step as shown in the second figure. Instead of putting 4 bits together as in the OFDM example to form the signal for one sub-carrier, the additional processing block in SC-FDMA spreads the information of each bit over all the sub-carriers. This is done as follows: Again, a number of bits (e.g. 4 representing a 16 QAM modulation) are grouped together. In OFDM, these groups of bits would have been the input of the IDFT. In SC-FDMA, however, these bits are now piped into a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) function first. The output of the process is the basis for the creation of the sub-carriers for the following IFFT. As not all sub-carriers are used by the mobile station, many of them are set to zero in the diagram. These may or may not be used by other mobile stations.

On the receiver side the signal is demodulated, amplified and treated by the Fast Fourier Transformation function in the same way as in OFDMA. The resulting amplitude diagram, however, is now not analyzed straight away to get the original data stream but fed to the Inverse Fast Fourier Transformation function to remove the effect of the additional signal processing originally done at the transmitter side. The result of the IFFT is again a time domain signal. The time domain signal is now fed to a single detector block which recreates the original bits. Thus, instead of detecting the bits on many different sub-carriers, only a single detector is used on a single carrier.

Summary of the difference between OFDM and SC-FDMA:

OFDM takes groups of input bits (0’s and 1’s) to assemble the sub-carriers which are then processed by the IDFT to get a time signal. SC-FDMA in contrast first runs an FFT over the groups of input bits to spread them over all sub-carriers and then uses the result for the IDFT which creates the time signal. This is why SC-FDMA is sometimes also referred to as FFT spread OFDM.

While SC-FDMA adds additional complexity at both the transmitter and receiver side, the 3GPP standardization body has nevertheless decided for it as treating signal this way reduces the Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR). This is important to lower the power consumption of mobile devices. More details on PAPR can be found here.

Ericsson Paper on HSDPA Performance And Evolution

Frequent readers of my blog might have noticed my fascination for real live HSDPA performance as of late. Here’s a paper from Ericsson on HSDPA performance with category 12 and 6 terminals in stationary and moving environments in live networks. Based on my own measurements I fully agree with their results. At the end it also contains a quick overview of enhancements to come to increase overall bandwidth of the network and per user. A well written paper!

The PAPR Problem

I’ve happened to stumble over PAPR (Peak to Average Power Ratio) quite a lot lately as it seems to play a big role in WiMAX and 3GPP LTE mobile devices. Most papers mention that LTE has a better PAPR than WiMAX but fail to explain what it is and why this is so important. After some research and help from a number of experts here’s an intro to PAPR:

When transmitting data from the mobile terminal to the network, a power amplifier is required to boost the outgoing signal to a level high enough to be picked up by the network. The power amplifier is one of the biggest consumers of energy in a device and should thus be as power efficient as possible to increase the operation time of the device on a battery charge. The efficiency of a power amplifier depends on two factors:

  • The amplifier must be able to amplify the highest peak value of the wave. Due to silicon constraints, the peak value decides over the power consumption of the amplifier.
  • The peaks of the wave however do not transport any more information than the average power of the signal over time. The transmission speed therefore doesn’t depend on the peak power output required for the peak values of the wave but rather on the average power level.

As both power consumption and transmission speed are of importance for designers of mobile devices the power amplifier should consume as little energy as possible. Thus, the lower the difference between the peak power to the average power (PAPR) the longer is the operating time of a mobile device at a certain transmission speed compared to devices that use a modulation schemes with a higher PAPR.

Now let’s come back to the beginning of this blog entry in which I said that papers generally say that LTE has a better PAPR than WiMAX. This is because of different modulation schemes used in the uplink. While WiMAX uses OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access) which is fast but has a high PAPR, LTE designers choose to use SC-FDMA (Single Carrier – Frequency Division Multiple Access) which is as fast but is said to have a better PAPR. So what’s OFDMA and SC-FDMA? Well, that’s for another blog entry.

Going to Boston

Looks like I’ll be in Boston at the beginning of June for a couple of days. As I haven’t been at the east coast before please let me know if you have any suggestions for things to see in and around Boston, wireless, technology and historical. My schedule is packed with interesting and exciting stuff but I am sure I’ll find the time for a bit of sightseeing as well. If you live near by and would like to meet, please let me know as well. My eMail address is "gsmumts AT gmx.de".