My Credit Card Chip Works in France Now

An electronic payment story today: The credit card industry has been through quite some pain in Germany the past couple of weeks with a year 2010 bug hampering transactions at teller machines and in shops. But here's some good news I wanted to post long before but forgot:

For many years electronic payment in France was a pain for me as the chip on my German EC/maestro card didn't work there. I always had to tell shop assistants not to use the chip but to swipe the card through to read the magnetic stripe. I got so frustrated that I reverted to paying with cash or with a credit card that did not yet have a chip.

So after another little glitch late last year when credit card information was supposedly stolen in Spain, credit card companies around the world replaced affected cards in a hurry. Probably due to having been at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona I was one those customers getting a replacement card. This time it contained a chip and this one now works in France as well. Great, at least from this perspective the credit card industry finally gets their act together. Now I can blend in again…

Let's hope the 2010 bug doesn't ruin it again… Just makes me wonder where we are with mobile payment in Europe these days. Probably still nowhere.

Impressions from the 2nd Anniversary Meeting of MoMo Norway

4306467054_6180b63f1d_b I'm back at home after a short visit to Norway this week to give a talk at the 2nd anniversary meeting of MoMo Oslo on Monday. It's been a great trip and a great MoMo with about 150-200 people showing up for the event. With Steinar Svalesen, Ajit Jaokar, Tomi Ahonen, Andrew Grill and Karine Storaker Braaten I think we offered a diverse program and despite the long program of over 3 hours the hall was still packed at the end. Thanks very much to Shaun Thanki for making it happen! Thanks also to all the people taking the time to talk to me after the presentation I learnt a lot about life and mobile in Norway!

No need to take it from me though, all presentations, the video and pictures can be found online:

I'd say that's excellent online coverage of the event!

And I learnt a couple of mobile things while walking a bit through Oslo: Two things are hard to find: Mobile phone stores from network operators and base station antennas. Both are very well hidden and you have to look closely 🙂 Also, I didn't see or hear anything of the LTE network supposedly running in Oslo!?

Picture above courtesy of MoMo Norways Flickr stream.

Why a TISPAN IMS Has It Much Easier

In my latest book I have not only described how IMS works in mobile networks in Chapter 4 but I also gave a short introduction to the fixed line counterpart which was initially specified by TISPAN before the activities were merged in 3GPP. I've been wondering a bit lately if it's going to be easier to implement IMS in fixed line networks compared to mobile networks. Here's what I think is much easier:

  • Legacy Device Reuse: In mobile networks, IMS requires mobile phones with IMS clients and a sophisticated packet switched radio network. In fixed line, things are much simpler. Customers just keep the analog phones they have today and either plug them into an analog to SIP converter that is part of their DSL or cable modem at home. If the analog to SIP converter is in the next street cabinet, the user doesn't have to do anything. To him IMS will be completely transparent.
  • No interworking with a legacy network from a user point of view: Once a line is physically connected to the IMS system, it's just using that system. Period. In wireless, mobile phones often fall back to GSM where IMS is not available. In that case the legacy circuit switched system has to be used or at least a circuit bearer next to the IMS packet switched signaling. Not pretty and very complicated.
  • No handovers to CS: A fixed line is a fixed line, no handover of an ongoing call to a circuit switched channel is required as a fixed line device never leaves it's place and network of origin. Compare that to wireless IMS where a mobile can leave the UMTS or LTE coverage area and has to be switched to a circuit switched bearer before contact is lost. A nightmare in practice.
  • Different Mindset: In wireless, IMS is the IP MULTIMEDIA subsystem and many see voice telephony as just one service to run over it. In the fixed line world, I have the impression that for most people the IMS is there to put voice calls on an IP bearer (PSTN and ISDN emulation service) but that's pretty much it. No big dreams of IMS as the universal service platform for everyone and everything. 

Thoughts, anyone?

I’ll be at Mobile Monday Oslo on Monday

Logo_mobilemonday_m Tomorrow's going to be an interesting day for me as I'll be in Oslo at the Mobile Monday focusing this time on Mobile Social Media and Telecoms 2.0. Among others, Tomi Ahonen, Ajit Jaokar and Andrew Grill will also be there, so it's going to be an interesting mix of thoughts flowing in from all over the mobile space. Very much looking forward to it, thanks to Shaun Thanki for organizing the event! If you are in or around Oslo tomorrow, I'd be happy to meet up!

Why The % is So Meaningless

These days I see a lot of talk in the press about rising wireless data consumption. To make things more spectacular, things don't double, no they rise by 100% (or by 200% or by 400% [insert your own % here]). Sounds much more dramatic, no? But what's even worse is that without a base from which the rise is calculated, it's completely meaningless. And usually that base is not given.

Here's an example: Let's say network use was 1%. Doubling that brings the network use to 2%. That's a lot isn't it? 100% more but the network is still sitting around doing pretty much nothing. But 100% more…(Note: Agreed, I've selected the other extreme for my example here…)

Also, such numbers kind of suggest that things will continue to grow at the same rate or even faster and the numbers are set in a light that suggests operators are in real trouble in the very near future. But that's also a wrong assumption. At some point everybody has 5 phones, several 3G dongles, etc. and bandwidth needs will mainly grow with more use from the same number of people and devices. And how much growth that requires is a different story again.

But one thing is clear, mobile operators need to increase the capacity of their networks over time to keep up with the demand. But then that's not much different from what fixed line operators do to keep up with the demand for high speed Internet connections. Maybe they have to do even more with digging up roads, putting new fibers in, etc. From a different point of view they are even doing the ground work for wireless network capacity extensions as they will also benefit from the fibers in the ground.

Changes in the Vendor Landscape – 2005 to 2010

Changes over time tend to blend in into everyday work unless you really think about them. Just recently, I came across a list of network vendors I wrote down in 2005 to give readers examples of big wireless network infrastructure vendors. The list read:

  • Siemens, Nortel, Ericsson, Alcatel and Nokia

Obviously the list is not exhaustive and not in a particular order. Powerhouses in 2005, no?

Now it's 2010 and four out of those five no longer exist in that form or shape. Today the list would read:

  • Ericsson, Nokia Siemens Networks, Huawei, Alcatel-Lucent

Predictions for 2015, anyone?

The Most Important 3GPP Features From Release 5 to 10

I can still remember the days when 3GPP Release 99 was the latest and greatest with the introduction of UMTS and data rates of 384 kbit/s. It's not that long ago really, and it's incredible how much has changed since then. As I went through the feature descriptions I drew up a list of which features I personally think are the most important ones in each release:

Release 4

  • Even today, Release 4 is still synonymous with the definition of the Bearer Independent Core Network (BICN) or, in other words, the virtualization of the circuit switched network.

Release 5

  • Introduction of the IMS which has continued to be developed throughout all following releases
  • The specification of High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA). I think this is one of the single most important features ever specified. Without it, UMTS would look entirely different today.

Release 6

  • Introduction of High Speed Packet Uplink (HSUPA)

Release 7

  • Specification of HSPA+ with 64QAM and MIMO
  • Enhancements to conserve battery power and to make state changes quicker for a better browsing experience. Also referred to as Continued Packet Connectivity
  • HSUPA 16QAM for a faster uplink
  • Extended Cell Range. Wasn't that done for Australia?

Release 8

  • The LTE baseline release
  • Definition of Dual Carrier HSDPA
  • Simultaneous use of 64QAM and MIMO on a single carrier
  • Single Radio Voice Call Continuity to hand-over voice calls from a packet to a circuit switched bearer
  • Femtocell definition (Home NodeBs)
  • Small but Important: ICE (In Case of Emergency) information storage on the SIM card and retrieval in a standardized way to help first responders to contact your family and friends in case something has happened to you.

Release 9

  • Separate dual carriers to simultaneously transmit downlink data in the 900 and 2100 MHz band.
  • Dual carrier in the uplink
  • Inclusion of the European Digital Dividend band

Release 10

  • Information on the content of Release 10 is still sketchy at this time. The one thing that is clear at this point that it will contain the baseline for LTE Advanced.

Agreed, a very very short list considering the dozens and dozens of features in each release. So, what have I been missing that will really make an impact? Do you have other favorites?

Gloves and Heatable Mobiles

While waiting out in the open for the tram on my daily commute I like browsing the web and reading my favourite blogs on the mobile phone. Not so these days, however, it's just not a lot of fun in sub-zero temperatures. So I prefer wearing gloves and keeping my hands in my pockets. In noticed, though, that the battery gets a bit warm while surfing if I can't resist which at least helps a bit. So what about a little built in heating at the back of the mobile? Yes, the battery would drain faster but it would be usable in sub-zero temperatures. Yes, I am only half joking here, but I am not quite convinced it's just a stupid idea. I wonder why Nokia, coming from a Nordic country never had the idea. Well, maybe with the temperatures there even heatable mobiles wouldn't help in winter 🙂

Video about 3GPP Release 9 work

Here's a link to an interesting video produced by 3GPP during the September 2009 plenary meeting in Seville, Spain. In the video the plenary chairmen of Service Architecture (SA), GERAN (GSM/GPRS/EDGE radio access), RAN (UMTS and LTE radio access) and CT (Core Network and Terminals) give their opinion on the state of the industry, where 3GPP is heading and the main features currently discussed for Release 9. And from a procedural point of view you get short insights in how 3GPP meetings a run and how many people attend.

Update: LTE Self-Organizing Networks

Putting cell towers in place is one thing, optimizing their coverage quite another. Today, a lot of planning is required in advance to make sure all required neighboring cell information and handover parameters are available, antennas are installed and configured with the correct angle in order not to create too much interference in the coverage area of neighboring cells, etc. etc. With adding yet another radio layer with LTE, things are not getting any easier if everything has to be done by hand and later-on check and refined with drive tests. Furthermore, networks are never static as new cells added, as frequency plans change, etc., so frequent quality checks like drive tests are required.

To reduce the amount of work required, 3GPP is working on a standard for LTE to be a bit more self-organizing, self-correcting and reporting issues that can't be fixed automatically to maintenance. A number of papers have been written to cover the current state in 3GPP on this topic, for example by Nomor back in 2008 (see here) and by 3G Americas recently (see here). In the 3GPP archives, the following technical report might be of interest to you on which the subsequent standardization is based on:

3GPP TR 36.902: Self-configuring and self-optimizing network (SON) use cases and solutions

With 3GPP Release 9, time has come to put things into Technical Specification (TS) documents. These can be found in the 3GPP 32-series starting with TS 32.500. Here's a list (no exhaustive) of documents that sound especially interesting:

  • 3GPP TS 32.500: "Telecommunication management; Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Concepts and requirements"
  • 3GPP TS 32.501 and 36.502: "Self-Configuration of Network Elements; Concepts and Integration Reference Point (IRP) Requirements" and "Information Service (IS)"

Quite an impressive list and the whitepapers mentioned above list the following features that are thought of in 3GPP:

  • Self-configuration: Retrieve basic operation parameters from a centralized configuration server when the cell is first activated.
  • Automatic Neighbor Relation (ANR): Mobile devices can report cells to the base station they are currently served by that are not in the neighbor list. This information can then be used by the network to automatically establish neighbor relationships for handovers.
  • Coverage and Capacity Optimization: Interference between cells due to too much overlap ov the coverage area and the opposite, coverage holes, are one of the main enemies of every network planner. Such conditions are usually detected with drive tests. Here SON aims to use mobile device and base station measurements to detect these issues. While interference can potentially be reduced automatically, unintended coverage holes can sometimes only be fixed with additional base stations. In such a case the equipment could at least notify the network operator.
  • Energy Saving: Reduce transmission power in case it is not needed, automatic shutdown and re-initialization of femtocells when the user arrives in or leaves the coverage area of the femto.
  • Physical Cell ID configuration: This is a very short id that mobile devices can read without decoding the full broadcast channel. Only 504 IDs are available so they are not unique. Therefore, an auto-configuration is highly desirable. Again, the mobile is required to report to the network which cells it sees for the configuration process.
  • Handover optimization: By analyzing the failure causes of handovers, coverage holes or wrong handover decisions can be detected and changed.
  • Load Balancing: If a cell already experiences high load from many users, send users at the cell edge to nearby cells.
  • Random Access Channel Optimization: The random access channel (RACH) is needed for the initial communication between non synchronized mobile devices and the network. Depending on the load, the number of resources dedicated to the RACH can be changed dynamically.

Quite a list! Interesting though that for the moment, all actions pretty much focus on LTE only. Lots of potential therefore for the future to extend SON functionality to the interworking with GSM and UMTS networks. In that regard I wonder if in the future network vendors will manage to offer an integrated SON an general management functionality for GSM, UMTS and LTE.

Ideally in a world where base stations are (auto-) software configurable on the fly for whatever air interface technologies are required at a certain place at a certain time. Advanced multi-mode base stations, but that's another topic…